![]() |
|
||||||||
Home / Set Strategies / Assessing Financial and Econom... Assessing Financial and Economic Impacts: A Guide to Informed Decision-Making | |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This guide contains the following sections:
For more information on the contents of this section, contact us. 1.0 IntroductionI. Introduction: Why Assess Economic Impact?
Financial and economic impact assessments are essential tools in identifying the potential consequences of municipal decisions. Sometimes they reveal unforeseen costs to the municipality, while other times they may reveal benefits, including spin-off effects, which would not have been identified without the analysis. They can be used any time decisions need to be made about a large project. This could include capital budgeting, funding proposals, specific development proposals, and resource allocation decisions. They can also be used to assess the impact of planning and economic development policy decisions. | Top of Page | II. Who Is This Guide Written For?This Guide is written specifically for economic development officers, as well as municipal staff and other community decision-makers. It provides an overview of the relevance of financial and economic impact assessments, outlines how to construct these assessments and the information (data) you will need to construct them, and illustrates through case studies how the assessment process works for different types of projects. The Guide will be especially useful for those who would like a basic understanding of how to assess economic and financial impacts, and the ability to determine when a more comprehensive analysis is needed. This Guide is also designed to help readers to be able to critically review impact studies prepared by others or claims put forward in project proposals. III. Assessing Financial and Economic Impacts
| Top of Page | Assessing the Net Economic Benefits of Development
It is often very difficult to capture all the costs and benefits of a decision. For example, when purchasing a new car, we may have a clear understanding of immediate costs, such as the purchase price of the car, but other costs are harder to predict, such as maintenance expenses and parking fees. These may require some assumptions or estimates on our part. There are also some costs that we cannot feasibly estimate at all, such as the extra cost to society of the pollution our car will generate, and the wear and tear on roads that we will cause with the car. In the same way, it can be very difficult to accurately assess all the costs and benefits of a large project in a municipality. Any kind of economic analysis will require making certain assumptions about the community and the project. These include assumptions about conditions that will exist without the project ("baseline conditions"), such as population growth, the skills of the local labour force or the industry mix in the local economy. There may also be assumptions about the project, such as the projected labour needs or volume of municipal services needed each year. It is important to recognize that changing the assumptions could mean a significant difference in the results of the assessment. Assumptions need to be tested to determine the degree to which they affect the outcome of any financial or economic impact analysis. If simple assumptions significantly change the results, there may be a need to obtain more information in order to eliminate some of the assumptions, or reconsider the method of analysis to reduce the impacts of the assumptions.
Another consideration in selecting the methodology for an impact assessment is the level of resources available to conduct the analysis. Increasing the accuracy of an impact study typically involves using more detailed or in-depth analytical methods, which in turn implies greater investment of time and money for data collection and analysis. A balance must be struck between what a community can afford to spend on the analysis and the desired level of accuracy. Often an understanding of the direction (i.e. positive or negative) of the impact is sufficient to assist the decision-making process. When comparing different project alternatives, it is advisable to conduct a preliminary analysis to get a rough idea of how close the alternatives are in terms of potential impact. If the preliminary assessment of different project alternatives suggests that the best alternative (for investment or resource allocation) is substantially superior to the next best alternative, then it may take only rough computations to confirm that superiority. However, if the preliminary assessment suggests the alternative projects have very similar impacts, you may need to use a more in depth methodology to provide a more accurate measure of the potential costs and benefits of each alternative. | Top of Page | IV. Impact Assessments and the Planning Process in OntarioDevelopment - especially that which is large, unique or potentially precedent-setting - may have a substantial impact on a community's financial, environmental and cultural resources. While this document deals only with financial impacts and economic impacts, a thorough assessment of private and public initiatives involves many other considerations, and usually occurs within a mandated approval process. In the Province of Ontario, the planning process provides the primary controls for development. As a result, all proposals for land use changes must meet the requirements of the Ontario Planning Act and the Provincial Policy Statement. In addition, there are other Provincially-mandated processes that projects may be subject to, such as the Environmental Assessment Act. As such, financial/economic impact analyses are often integrated with other approval processes or analyses in order to inform the decision-making process.
| Top of Page | V. When Should a Financial and/or Economic Assessment Be Conducted?In short – do it early in the process. Financial and/or economic impact analyses should be considered as soon as a development or project is proposed, and well before substantial investment has been committed. If a planning approval is required, the financial impact and/or economic impact analyses should be undertaken as part of the background work conducted by municipal staff to inform the public and the decision of Council. Often such studies are carried out and/or paid for by the proponent of a development. Financial impact and/or economic impact analyses of public sector projects should be carried out early in the process of capital budgeting, so that priorities can be established. Such analyses particularly lend themselves to a comparison of several initiatives, allowing Council to understand the relative costs and benefits of different options. VI. Where to Get More InformationUsually the proponent of a proposal or project can provide much of the information needed to carry out an assessment. In addition, there are many other good sources of data and examples of financial and economic impact assessments available on the web and in hard copy. Current sources are noted in Section Four of this document, and direct links are provided where available. Continue to Section 2: Financial Impact Assessment | Top of Page |
Links to Other Sections | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| central
site | feedback | search
| site map | français
| | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||